Skip to content
ActaCyber
FEDRAMP 20X // OPENS AUGUST 3

FedRAMP 20x: into the marketplace without a sponsor

Cybersecurity compliance shouldn't be a headache. It should be a native, fluid part of your development process.

Direct submission opens August 3. There is no reason you cannot be ready to submit on day one.

THE SHIFT

What changed with FedRAMP 20x

THE OLD WORLD
  • ×An agency sponsor before you could start
  • ×Months of narrative documents and manual review
  • ×A process long and complicated enough to need consultants to navigate it
THE NEW WORLD
  • Direct submission by software vendors, application developers, and engineers
  • Machine-readable JSON artifacts that prove the state of your cloud, your application, and your users
  • Published rules and Key Security Indicators anyone can validate against, via the published FedRAMP rules

Preparing early means submitting on day one, and ACTA generates every artifact from your live environment rather than from paperwork.

ARCHITECTURE, NOT MARKETING

Do not trust vendors using MCP for cybersecurity compliance

Model Context Protocol is a genuinely good protocol. It was built to connect AI assistants to tools, and for that job, it works well.

But MCP's entire purpose is delivering context to a large language model. So when a vendor advertises MCP inside a cybersecurity compliance pipeline, they are telling you that a probabilistic token generator sits between your evidence and your submission artifacts. Some FedRAMP 20x vendors openly advertise MCP-based validation.

ACTA explicitly does not use MCP, LLMs, or agents anywhere in the compliance path. Every assessment runs on goRapide, BMD's causal event decision language, deterministic from input to output.

ACTA (deterministic)LLM + MCP pipelines (probabilistic)
GenerationCausal engine, same inputs produce same outputsTokenized generation, sampled output
RepeatabilityIdentical artifacts, scores, and evidence every runSmall differences run to run: a different compliance package every time
Failure modeInspectable causal chain behind every decisionHallucination, misreads, silent drift
Evidence handlingRead and parsed deterministically inside your boundaryFetched via MCP into a model that may misinterpret it
AuditabilityReplay the journey, get the same answerCannot reproduce yesterday's output
ACTA (deterministic)
run 1
{ "artifact": "ssp-boundary-01",
"controls_passed": 142,
"hash": "a3f9c2e1" }
run 2
{ "artifact": "ssp-boundary-01",
"controls_passed": 142,
"hash": "a3f9c2e1" }
run 3
{ "artifact": "ssp-boundary-01",
"controls_passed": 142,
"hash": "a3f9c2e1" }
identical
LLM + MCP pipelines (probabilistic)
run 1
{ "artifact": "ssp-boundary-01",
"controls_passed": 141,
"hash": "b7e1a409" }
run 2
{ "artifact": "ssp-boundary-01",
"controls_passed": 139,
"hash": "e28d9f13" }
run 3
{ "passed_controls": 142,
"artifact": "ssp-boundary-01",
"hash": "44ac0b92" }
different every run

Small differences are unacceptable in compliance, because the package is the product. ACTA is 100 percent deterministic.

OWNERSHIP MODEL

Own your compliance. Do not rent it.

Many competitors are integrators. They assemble other vendors' software into one dashboard and charge you to live in their hotel indefinitely.

With ACTA you manage your own cybersecurity posture, your own certifications, and your own artifacts the same way you already manage your own cloud environments, your own user roles, and your own permissions.

Compliance becomes a normal part of your business process that you own, because the people building the software should own its security posture.

SPEED, WITHOUT SKIPPING THE WORK

Ready to submit in under 24 hours

CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE
  • Native scanning on Grype and Trivy, with cross-engine deduplication so one finding does not become two tickets
  • New CVEs and CISA KEV entries inside your boundary known the day they are reported
  • Mitigate, regenerate your artifacts deterministically, and submit fresh evidence back to the marketplace
  • Continuous compliance instead of decay between audits

With ACTA, it is entirely possible to be ready to submit to FedRAMP 20x in under 24 hours.

Assumes your CVEs are already mitigated and your environment is cybersecurity compliant. ACTA generates the proof deterministically; it does not skip the security work.

Meanwhile, competitors are still writing POA&Ms by hand and asking language models to guess at JSON.

TRANSPARENT PRICING

The lower cost path to the marketplace

PER SEAT
$5,000/seat/month

For startups taking one product into the marketplace.

ENTERPRISE
from $250,000/year

For organizations managing several applications across several federal boundaries.

Typical competitor paths stack consultants, integrator subscriptions, advisory retainers, and months of billable humans into five to ten times the total cost of reaching submission. ACTA publishes its pricing openly.

WHO IT IS FOR

Built for startups and mature enterprises

STARTUPS

A startup with a single product and a small team gets per-seat pricing and a day-one path into the marketplace, with no sponsor and no integrator to depend on.

ENTERPRISE

A large enterprise managing several applications across several federal boundaries gets an enterprise license and one deterministic posture across all of them.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is FedRAMP 20x?

FedRAMP 20x is the program's modernization of authorization: instead of a sponsor-led, document-heavy process, software vendors submit machine-readable JSON artifacts that prove the state of their cloud, application, and users against published rules and Key Security Indicators. Direct submission opens August 3.

Do I need an agency sponsor for FedRAMP 20x?

No. That is the core change. The traditional path required a federal agency to sponsor your authorization before you could start. FedRAMP 20x lets software vendors, application developers, and engineers submit directly to the marketplace with machine-readable evidence, no sponsor required.

What are the machine-readable artifacts?

JSON documents, validated against the published FedRAMP rules schema, that assert the live state of your environment: your cloud configuration, your application, your users and their access. ACTA generates them deterministically from your running environment rather than from questionnaires or manually authored narratives.

How fast can I be ready to submit?

With ACTA it is entirely possible to be ready to submit in under 24 hours, because artifact generation is deterministic and runs against your live environment. That assumes your CVEs are already mitigated and your environment is cybersecurity compliant; ACTA generates the proof, it does not skip the security work.

What happens when a new CVE or KEV appears in my boundary?

You know the day it is reported. ACTA's native scanning flags new CVEs and CISA KEV entries inside your boundary as the feeds update, so you can mitigate quickly, regenerate your artifacts, and submit fresh evidence back to the marketplace. Compliance stays continuous instead of decaying between audits.

How much does ACTA cost for FedRAMP 20x?

Seats are $5,000 per month, which suits startups taking a single product into the marketplace. Enterprise licenses start at $250,000 per year for organizations managing several applications across several federal boundaries. Typical competitor paths, with consultants, integrator subscriptions, and months of billable work, run five to ten times the total cost to submission.

How is ACTA different from AI-based compliance tools?

ACTA runs on goRapide, BMD's causal event decision language, with no LLMs, no agents, and no probabilistic components in the compliance path. The same journey produces identical artifacts, scores, and evidence every run. Tools built on large language models generate output token by token, so their packages can differ from run to run.

Why should MCP not be used in compliance?

Model Context Protocol exists to deliver context to a large language model. It is a fine protocol for connecting AI assistants to tools, but when a vendor puts MCP in a compliance pipeline, a probabilistic model sits between your evidence and your submission artifacts. Compliance evidence should be read and parsed deterministically, not interpreted by a model that can misread it.

FEDRAMP 20X // OPENS AUGUST 3

Be ready on day one

FedRAMP 20x opens August 3. Start preparing now and walk in with your artifacts already generated.